Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10

Download scientific diagram | Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b) κ = 0 . 18, (c) κ = 0 . 30. We pick the second as the resultant model because of its good compatibility between weighted mis fi t and solution roughness. The numbers between the triangles in (a) indicate the segments. The white star denotes the epicenter from Harvard CMT solution.  from publication: 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery | Imagery, Imagery (Psychotherapy) and Earthquake | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)