Search

STRUNK V THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Etal. NYND 16-cv-1496 (BKS / DJS) OSC WITH TRO Filed 12-15-2016 For 3 Judge Court Electoral College Challenge, PDF, Treaty

$ 25.50 · 4.6 (417) · In stock

As of April 19, 2017 his MOL and Declaration with Exhibits was filed and served. As of 22 March 2017 the Plaintiff 5 page letter has been submitted to the Court in support of a 3 Judge panel.; and as per the Current Docket starting at page 1 of the file the Plaintiff response to all the Motions to Dismiss is due by April 19. As of 17 February 2017 I received the Affidavits of personal service of California Defendants and for whom the Assistant CA AG Kevin Calia called and told me he ,making an appearance with a motion to dismiss on 11th amendment grounds and personal jurisdiction under the long arm doctrine. So far the docket does not reflect the California appearance. In that Undersigned has been barred from electronically entering the application into PACER as he is not an attorney. You can figure the hurry up and wait process is the City of Salt (Syracuse) the Novitiate home for the New York Province for the Society of Jesus, being the city whose salt mines flush their salt product down the sewers of the Tammany Hall controlled NYC streets do not want to lose any US House members (17 CDs for California and 1 CD for New York) under the penalties required by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment for Undersigned's fundamental Right infringement. PETITIONER'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE VARYING THE USUAL SCHEDULE FOR CONSIDERING A MOTION WHEN A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR OTHER PROVISIONAL REMEDY IS BEING SOUGHT PENDING A THREE JUDGE COURT with eight bound exhibits affirmed 12-29-2016 with a bound copy of the Petition for OSC with TRO; and The Affidavit of Service for the Petitioner's Affidavit item #2 Went to Court Friday Morning. The Clerk said the Judge will respond to OSC Motion Monday after she seeks to balance without gravity. Will keep you informed. PETITION with COMPLAINT for a three-judge panel mandamus by 19 December 2016 to restrain Defendants and proportionately reduce electors under the 14th Amendment NOW COMES Christopher Earl Strunk, in propria persona, a private national citizen of the United States and New York, hereby Petitions this Three-judge court for a mandamus with restraint of Respondents, as time is of the essence before 19 December 2016 with imminent irreparable harm on 6 January 2017, with no other adequate remedy at law and a likelihood of success; and hereafter, Strunk Complains of Defendants' infringement of Plaintiff's fundamental rights protected under the Constitution for the United States by the State of California's Public Officers malicious administration and enforcement of the California Election Code (CAEC) and related law to resolve the Trump-Pence electors, and of the conspiracy of the State of New York's and State of California's Public Officers with others similarly situated jointly with the Democratic Party National Committee to use illegal alien voters at the 8 November 2016 General Election of the California 55 elector and New York 29 electors slate for the 19 December 2016 election of President of the United States (POTUS) and Vice POTUS (VPOTUS) with United States Code (USC) Title 3 under color of California Election Code (CAEC) and New York Election Law (NYEL) to the contrary; and Plaintiff(s) among those citizens similarly situated with natural and fundamental rights otherwise protected against infringement by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment ( ) to the Constitution of the United States of America, with related law and available remedy. This is a case of first impression to reduce the basis of California and New York POTUS / VPOTUS Electors at the 19 December 2016 electoral college election and or new term of the U.S. House of Representatives on 6 January 2017 until the 2020 decennial census.

Cayetano vs. Monsod, PDF, Lawyer

File:16 Stat. 44 (1869).pdf - Wikipedia

Government Acronyms, PDF

Government Acronyms, PDF

Notes For Memo, PDF, Damages

Statements by Civil Rights Groups and TPS Holders on Ninth Circuit

85 Answer, PDF, Complaint

Notes For Memo, PDF, Damages

Republic vs. CA, PDF, Eminent Domain

Surety No More Confidentiality Agreement Copyright Protected Http

Notes For Memo, PDF, Damages

Advanced Microeconomics Analysis Worked Solutions Jehle Reny PDF

Rand Pea1157-1, PDF, Electronic Warfare

94 Non Resident Alien Chart, PDF, United States Code