Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore

Frontiers A Real World 10-Year Experience With Vascular Closure

Algorithm of access-site femoral arterial closure in percutaneous

/files/Articles/971762/fcvm-09

Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: New Criteria to Predict

Sebastian SADONI, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, München, LMU, Clinic of Cardiac Surgery

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after

Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.

Dry Field Closure of Large-Bore Access With Iliac Artery

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…